Republic of Cascadia Secessionist Movement

From Lingit Latseen

I’d like to introduce the Tlingit people and Pacific Northwest Coast tribes and First Nations to the Republic of Cascadia Secession Movmenet.

They are a bioregionalist movement and aspiring nation based in Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, and Southeast Alaska. Obviously, the proposed borders of this nation encompass traditional tribal territories. This Cascadian page speculates on what, exactly, Cascadia is.

An international economic relationship? A republic? A bioregion? A cooperative commonwealth? A network of communities based on mutual aid? A utopia?

Cascadia is a lot of things to a lot of different people. Some people see Cascadia as just a bioregion while others envision a republic or a commonwealth. Some see Cascadia as an ecological utopia waiting to awaken while others see Cascadia as one clear-cut after another between petroleum driven suburbia and sprawling shopping malls. To anyone truly looking or experiencing what Cascadia is then knows that Cascadia is many things with many possiblities.

Among proposed Articles of Cascadia is this one:

ARTICLE IX. NATIVE AND ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS

The entire document is worth a read, but Part 2. of Section 2. is of particular interest to me.

2. The First Nations shall have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired. All associated fishing and land use management shall be given to the respective Tribal Assemblies as part of their autonomy to govern as they see fit.

This article would essentially return traditional clan and tribe control of territorial waters to the tribes of Alaska, B.C. Oregon and Washington.

I firmly believe that our sovereignty comes from no outside entity, neither the US Government nor the aspiring Republic of Cascadia. We are sovereign and independent clans and tribes because of our acknowledgement of clan and tribal rights by our sister clans and cousin tribes, through our centuries of occupation of our land, through the blood shed in defense of our respective tribes and way of life, and through our sacred mothers, who have birthed and raised hundreds of generations of Native people’s in their respective nations. Still, we ought to think critically about whether or not our current relationship with the US Government ought to be severed and an alliance formed with secessionist movements.

During the rebellion of the 13 American colonies against Great Britian’s rule, East Coast tribes joined both sides of the conflict out of tribal self interest. In some cases the British offered a better deal than the Americans with regards to protection of tribal lands and acknowledgement of sovereignty. In other cases the Americans offered the better deal. Moving forward, I don’t think the US Empire is a stable entity, and I expect it to not outlive my children. Consequently, I think our respective tribes should think critically about who we form tactical alliances with in pursuit of our sovereignty and self determination.

Advertisements

About Vince

I am a Tlingit, born and raised in Tlingit Country, and a proud member of the Tlingit Nation.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Republic of Cascadia Secessionist Movement

  1. yes I 200% respect and honor Native Peoples’ sovereignty of their nation! hence another reason why I say Cascadia is NOT a nation… its a bioregion with Native People Nations within it.

    • sorry in their Nations .. plural

    • Vince says:

      Thanks, Alexander. I appreciate your thoughts.

      If you look at tribal nations on the North American continent you can see that bioregionalism, clan/band/village based territorialism, local autonomy & decentralization were among their defining features. These political structures are still in place in my tribe, but are greatly weakened from a political stand point.

      I’d imagine that a modern socio-political bioregion would work much the same. It might be a network or federation of independent communities with alliances and cooperative agreements to sustainably manage resources, depending on their scale. Within that network you could have hundreds of types of communities that internally organize their affairs as they see fit. This focus on localism would be an antidote to global corporatism and imperialism. What are today’s culture war issues, pitting left vs. right in an all or nothing struggle could be local matters. Communities could agree to disagree around certain matters, but still maintain a friendly alliance for the sake of mutual self defense and greater prosperity for the region.

      This is essentially how the tribes of the Pacific Northwest operated. Of course there was war and conflict. I think we are all smart enough to realize we are not proposing some utopia, rather, we are trying to mitigate the effects of corporate plutocracy, over extraction of resources, environmental degradation, the expansion of a soulless pop culture and everything that comes with it, imperialism, etc. etc.

  2. pdxthoughts says:

    Reblogged this on pdxthoughts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s